Friday, 29 November 2013

Photography in a Connected Age - Study Day






I recently attended Photography in a Connected Age. A workshop consisting of lectures from practitioners of photography relating to photography in the digital age.

This event was attended by a number of OCA students as part of an official study day. We had a presentation from Roger Hargreaves who talked about the controlled use of social media by the Obama campaign using small compact cameras. He argued that it was an awareness of the importance of social media that helped Obama to win the election. The images shown during the talk gave an interesting behind the scenes insight into how much effort goes into American politics.

One of the lectures by Alexandra Moschovi seemed to revolve mostly around the use of the forthcoming Google Glass, a technology that intrigues me a little - but only a little...

Dr Loplop spoke about the spread of cat images across social media sites - illustrating how an image can begin life online quite innocuously as someones pet photo and evolve into more and more bizarrely manipulated combinations. I learnt a new word, 'lolcats' which seems to stand for cat images with funny text written across them. The talk was a strange and surreal experience but as a past frequenter of the website cats in sinks I'll think leave it there.

Jason Evans gave, for me, the standout talk - mostly about his practice. His determined energy for his work really brought his lecture to life. He seemed almost passionate and frustrated with photography in equal measure. I had always wondered what the coloured dots in many of his images were as he explained about the conceptual interpretation of the visual sparkles on water and light in a room at a certain time of day - How he liked to catch the essence of the things he photographs. His style of photography looks very fresh to my eyes and when studying other photographers (and my own) work afterwards, it can look staid by comparison. In my own work I am often drawn to this kind of image making and then frequently pull away in favour of more formal compositions. I've mentioned this before and I need to work through this and come to some sort of conclusion. As my tutor, Keith, once said, 'less is often more.'

Snippets of Evans politics and social conscience came through during the talk - he appears to have no time for the big corporations and money grabbing institutions. The teaching of photography in academia came under fire too. Being a student of photography this was very interesting to listen to obviously.

Evans spoke about the curriculum being far too narrow in its teaching. That all the universities and colleges were teaching from a set of academic ideas and theories arising from the 1970s and 80s. That they are outdated and have not moved on in their thinking. Which appears to be true to some extent. Certainly most of the critical theory for my current PWDP course contains these texts. I would argue though that as he was presumably once a student himself, then Evans has had this same foundation from which to build upon. A place is needed from which to strike out and question the nature of photography in order to move forward. As a mature student I enjoy reading these texts - it's all new to me and I get a lot out of them. Evans also admitted that he finds himself not suited to teaching in academia. That he has no interest in teaching photography using their narrow disciplines but rather prefers to help students find a way of learning a visual language in which to view the world. I think that's what he said, I was so engrossed in his lecture I didn't take any notes.

I feel I am learning a new visual language as I progress with this degree course. So, to be honest I'm not sure what he meant by that. Maybe the teaching is very different at other places. He gave a very interesting talk.

Wednesday, 27 November 2013

Assignment 4

Today I began my research for Assignment 4. I will be looking at gender representation in photography. Mostly looking at it from the aspect of women as there has been much critical discussion around this subject.

I've looked at some of the relevant texts in the course reader. I decided to use the study method described in the course notes to paraphrase a paragraph at a time after a first read through. This enabled me to get to the gist of the text and has proved to be very useful.

Edit 23rd October:
Feeling a bit down today. Depression is something I have always struggled with. I've been reading essays from the course on the subject of the 'gaze' and making notes. I think I might only do a half day study today and slow down a bit to re-charge my batteries.

I've looked up some primary sources relating to the subject of gender representation and ordered them from the library.

My preparation strategy for my assignment is to do lots of research, make notes and then hope a topic or structure will somehow coalesce in my mind. This works for me visually with photography projects but I have a nagging worry that this isn't going to happen this time. Plan B is to do a bit more researching and reading and then contact my tutor with a plea for help.

That's it for now. I think a cup of coffee and a catch up with the Grayson Perry lecture on iPlayer is probably the best thing to boost my mood.

Edit 7th November:
I thought that I would be further on with my essay than I am. I had a huge amount of reading and research to do on my topic of gender representation in photography. There are so many side issues with psychoanalytic theory being one of the biggest topics to cover. I've read a number of essays including their primary sources. My tutor has also recommended a good book that really expands on a lot of the theories. It is hard going though and I'm having to stop at virtually every sentence to look up words that I've never come across before. I think I'm getting the gist of it though.

My research is mostly done and with half an eye on my end of November deadline I've begun to draw up an outline of my essay. I went back to the course notes and began by writing down a checklist of items that must be covered. Here's the list:

CHECK LIST:
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SOURCES
QUOTE PHOTOGRAPHIC WORKS/PHOTOGRAPHERS
EVALUATE ALL SOURCES
ASK THESE QUESTIONS:
  • WHAT IS WRITERS RELATIONSHIP TO THE WORK?
  • WHEN WAS THE ACCOUNT WRITTEN?
  • FACT OR OPINION?
  • OBJECTIVE OR BIASED?
  • IN A POSITION TO WRITE AUTHORITATIVELY?
  • WHAT RESEARCH HAS BEEN DONE?
  • WHAT IS THE AUDIENCE AND HOW MIGHT THIS INFLUENCE THE ARGUMENT?
  • DON'T RELY ON WRITTEN SOURCES ONLY – EXHIBITIONS
  • MUST BE REFERENCED
THREE TYPES OF WRITING ABOUT PHOTOGRAPHY:
  • DESCRIPTION
  • INTERPRETATION
  • JUDGEMENT

CONCLUSION
REFERENCES



Once I had this down I turned back to my course notes and re-read the notes on how to construct the critical essay and transferred the information to my document:

TITLE
STATEMENT? – DEFEND
QUESTION? – ANSWER

INTRODUCTORY PARAGRAPH - 150 WORDS
INTRODUCE THE QUESTION, STATEMENT

INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND – 500 WORDS
DESCRIBE THE SITUATION/CONTEXT/HISTORICAL BACKGROUND

OUTLINE YOUR ARGUMENT – 200 WORDS
INTRODUCE THE ARGUMENT/ANSWER QUESTION
SUMMARISE AND INDICATION OF CONCLUSION

BODY OF ARGUMENT – 1000 WORDS
DEVELOP YOUR ARGUMENT PARAGRAPH BY PARAGRAPH
MENTION COUNTER ARGUMENTS, STATE POSITION
ANALOGIES TO PHOTOGRAPHY

CONCLUSION – 150 WORDS
RECAPITULATE AND SUMMARISE
DRAW CONCLUSION AND STATE HOW THIS AFFECTS OR IS RELEVANT TO YOUR OWN PHOTOGRAPHY


I found that by beginning my document in this manner I tricked myself into making a start - gets me past that blank page scenario!

There is always more research that can be done and there is a danger that it becomes a displacement activity for actually getting on and writing the essay. By creating a structure I put myself into writing mode.

Edit 14th November:

I'm really struggling with this essay. I've written about 1100 of the 2000 words so far and it is really hard going. I'm still on a first draft too so there is no end in sight for the next few weeks. I don't know why it it is but I feel like my thought processes are mired in treacle. I did loads of research on a topic that I find interesting and made copious notes so it should be such an easy matter to start pulling them together. I thought it would take me a couple of days to produce this essay but the actual writing is tortuous. I've only managed a couple of hundred words a day which is pitiful. I'm trying not to beat myself up over it though. I've put in place a couple of strategies to keep me going such as rewards for making a start each day - no matter how long it takes me to get some words out I allow myself a coffee and treat break or a trip into town when the sun is shining. I think I may have to pop out and get some fresh air today as well as I can feel my depression trying to get a grip and I'm determined to keep on top of it and not let my studies slip.

Edit 27th November:

It's finished! I did a re-read of my final draft last night. I was happy with it so I printed it out and asked my partner to have a read too. My tutor, Keith, advised at the start of this assignment that I get another person to have a look. Glad that I did as I had to make a couple of amendments just for clarity.  I spent today editing to lose a few hundred words - not easy! I'm still a little bit over the word limit. Then I checked the formatting instructions in the course notes and critical essay guide. I chose a font size, wide margins and double line spacing for my images and text so that the last few lines of paragraphs and image captions are not split across pages - I hate that. I still have until Friday to meet my end of month deadline so I think I will hang on to it and do another quick check tomorrow before sending it off.

I'm so relieved to get this essay off my hands to be honest. I spent far too much time on it. The writing just didn't come together as easily as I'd hoped. I never have a problem writing about my other assignments. I think my mood had a lot to do with. I've had a few mental health problems just lately and I've struggled.

Still, at least I don't have to think about the essay for a while now and can concentrate on catching up on pulling everything else together that I will need to get this course ready for assessment. I'm yet to start my final assignment so I don't think I will be any way near ready for March assessment - so it is looking like a summer assessment for the first time. I will start my next level 2 course in January, regardless. I still want to stay on track and try to complete a module a year.

Edit 6th January:

I'm a bit late in documenting my tutor feedback here as I received it before Christmas. On the whole the response was positive with some further research to be done (I have a book on order from the library and will post my thoughts here later) and there are a few minor grammatical errors to sort out.

I've also finished some background reading on women artists that I'd started well before my essay and took me a while to finish. My thoughts on it are here.

Edit 6th March: 

Today I began the edit of my critical essay. After a good few months break and with fresh eyes I was quite pleased with what I'd initially written. With that said I took into consideration my tutor's feedback and read his book recommendations. I've removed a couple of paragraphs from my essay to make way for some new thoughts. There were also a couple of reference typos to be amended. I think the changes have definitely tightened up the essay and improved it.

Edit 12th March:

I've undertaken some further research for my essay and written about the photographer E J Bellocq and his Storyville portraits. My thoughts can be found here.

My thoughts on the photographer Berenice Abbott can be found here.

Edit 17th March:

I've finally written the last draft of my essay. I've taken into account the points mentioned on my tutor feedback and incorporated them into my argument. This took me well over the word limit so a couple of superfluous (in the light of the new draft) paragraphs have been removed - I'm still over the word limit. I had a final look today and tweaked and removed some extra words - still over the word count though. I really don't think I can tighten up the essay any more so it is done and I can move on to other outstanding exercises for this blog in preparation for assessment. 

Monday, 4 November 2013

A Workflow & Printing Workshop

I attended a one day workshop at the printspace on Saturday. The course aimed to instill a methodical workflow when working on digital image files to ensure a consistent and high quality output for printing. We began by learning about the importance of having our camera and monitor setup correctly (must get a monitor hood!) before moving on to configuring the Photoshop workspace.

Once all the basics were in place we then looked at our image files and workflow. My own workflow is not too bad - with the exception that I don't tend to mess around too much with colour correction or saturation. I am wary of these two settings because my colour blindness tends to skew any changes I make. The difficulty is that any subtle changes are not that noticeable to me so I can't see the point - and changes that I can see tend to look overdone. Luckily the camera's auto white balance does a pretty good job in most daylight situations and I rarely work with mixed lighting. I have picked up a couple of tips regarding how the colour balance and saturation sliders should be set for daylight images when printing. I will incorporate this info into my workflow and will review the results.

The course mostly seemed to firm up what I had learnt in the Digital Photographic Practice module which was good in the respect that I hadn't forgotten this knowledge and it was useful to run over it again and not let my standards slip.

I only use an outside lab as I cannot justify the cost of my own printer, paper and ink for my images. It is good to know I'm doing most of the right things like soft proofing and using paper profiles. I think I just need to practice, practice, practice, when it comes to printing. Because I'm conscious of cost (delivery charges being the downside of online labs) I probably don't print nearly enough to get my standards to a consistent level and to compare and contrast with different versions of the same image.

This is why I'd also find being part of a study group useful. To get advice and have a standard to compare with. On the whole I'd say it was a good day at the workshop and now I just need to do a lot more printing.  

Thursday, 24 October 2013

Home Truths: More Thoughts

At the recent Home Truths: Motherhood, Photography and Identity exhibition I had a puzzling conversation with another student. Jason and myself had a difference of opinion over the series 'Annunciation' by Elina Brotherus. He felt that the images looked set up and therefore felt they weren't that truthful. The constructed nature of the images wasn't an issue for me. As I stated in my blog post at the time, the artist is perfectly aware that as well as recording her difficult experience with IVF she is also an artist making art. The reason I used the word puzzled is not that another student would see the same series of images differently from me but because I was curious as to where this difference in perspective comes from.

Then I had a lightbulb moment yesterday. I was reading 'The Photograph as an Intersection of Gazes' by Catherine Lutz and Jane Collins. I was trying to absorb some of the authors ideas around 'the gaze.' The authors Lutz and Collins have broken the gaze down into seven categories - a typology of gazes. It is only two that I am concerned with here. The photographers and the viewers gazes can (as Lutz and Collins explain) mostly be seen as the same thing. The photographer makes an image from a particular point of view and generally the viewer sees it (on a purely visual level) in the same way. It is only when there is an anomaly in the image, a colour cast, a tilted angle, a shadow or foot, that the viewer becomes aware of the presence of the photographer in the making of the image. This is where the gazes separate out.

So, bear with...

When I read the critical essay it seemed to chime with my thoughts and clarify what I was trying to express about the difference of opinion between Jason and myself over the Elina Brotherus work. The sticking point for Jason was that in some of the self portraits a cable release was visible as it snaked out of frame and back towards the camera. He questioned why Brotherus would leave it there. This is where I think the intersection of gazes comes into play. I was looking at the images from the point of view of the combined gazes of the 'photographer' and the 'viewer'. I was consciously aware that the artist was making art around the concept of IVF. And at the same time I was unconsciously switching between the two gazes when becoming emotionally absorbed by the subject matter. For Jason, I think, he may have looked at the work with the single gaze of the 'viewer'. In other words he was fully absorbed in the subject matter of IVF and not considering the gaze of the photographer as artist. So for him the presence of the cable release caused him to be aware of the 'photographer's gaze' creating a disconnect and his analysis that the images were not truthful. Phew... Does that make sense?

If I am correct in my analysis then the multiplicity of gazes and how they intersect at the site of the image can be a very useful tool for analysing and evaluating opinion.

Edit 26th Oct: I made an error in my recollection of the student conversation. It wasn't Jason after all. I think it may have been Jonathan. Please see comment below.



Bibliography:

The Photography Reader by Liz Wells (2003). Part 7 pg 354. The photograph as an Intersection of Gazes: The Example of National Geographic by Catherine Lutz and Jane Collins. 

Friday, 18 October 2013

Home Truths: Part 2, The Foundling Museum



Tierney Gearon
I wasn't particularly taken with this work when I saw it at the Foundling Museum. Maybe it was because I was tired from the day and the walk from the Photographer's Gallery - I was by then all arted out I suppose. For 'The Mother Project' Gearon has chosen the subject of her elderly mother's dementia and how that plays itself out in the lives of Gearon and her children. The subject sounds interesting enough. I just wasn't particularly engaged by the photographs - that is with one exception. The image of Gearon's mother standing in the snow on a petrol station forecourt is superb - in my opinion one of the best images in the show at both galleries. I love the spontaneity of it. The mother is holding a cigarette (at a petrol station!) and she is grinning, tilted forward slightly, her eyes clenched with laughter. It is a captured moment of pleasure. This image, for me, doesn't seem to sit that well with the rest of the sequence. It feels visually different from some of the other portraits that have very plain backgrounds (green grass, blue sky) and they look somewhat contrived.

Miyako Ishiuchi
The artist has photographed her mother's possession after she passed away. The objects, a couple of lipsticks, a hairbrush in a glass, a dress, etc were framed in small Plexiglas cases. The piece felt quite sterile to me. I didn't pick up a sense of the person that owned and used these things. They obviously meant a lot to the photographer, but not to me. They were just things, in close-up, without any other background or visual clues to a life lived. Again, as with the Gearon work I liked the concept but not the images. Maybe if they had been photographed in another style I would have felt differently.


Ann Fessler
'Along the Pale Blue River' is a video piece that maps the journey of the artist to find her biological mother. The artist shot her own film and has included collage and archival footage too. There is a sense of not quite grasping the narrative as it unfolds. It feels ambiguous and slips away as if time lines past and present are merging and diverging. This was my favourite piece in the Foundling Museum. I thought the film was put together well and visually it held my interest. Fessler is engaged in uncovering the hidden history of adoption in her country as opposed to the official sanctioned view.

Since 1990, I have tried to shed light on this hidden history both through my own perspective as an adoptee and through the stories I have collected from the mothers - women who were shamed into secrecy and rendered invisible and voiceless. (Fessler, 2001)


After the show I was surprised to read on the OCA Flickr forum that the students seemed to hold the opposite view to me - preferring The Foundling Museum. At first I put this down to myself as I nearly always seem to have a differing view to art from the majority for some reason. I thought about the work I had seen and tried to analyse why I preferred The Photographer's Gallery. I thought some of it more challenging and explored the boundaries around the construct of Motherhood more successfully - bringing in unexpected elements of the 'outsider' to the discussion or exploring motherhood from a conceptual angle. With the Foundling Museum, although there were elements that I did like, the work was quite Humanistic, for want of a better word. It didn't really engage me that much except for a few pieces. I was satisfied with this reasoning and then very surprised to read on the Flickr forum a bit later some of the other students re-questioning their preference for the FM too. One student, Eileen, had nagging feelings that she may have liked it more because the work explored concepts that are more 'accessible and familiar'. This reasoning chimed with me and I agree precisely because the FM work to me is not familiar. I enjoyed this study visit. It has raised so many questions about how I and others approach art, the social taboos that make people angry, and what I learnt about myself. All thought provoking stuff.




references:

Fessler, A. (2013) Exhibition catalogue, Home Truths: Photography and Motherhood. London, UK: Art Books Publishing Ltd. 

Thursday, 17 October 2013

Home Truths: Photography, Motherhood and Identity - Study Visit



I really enjoyed this exhibition. From what I'd read it touched on some interesting themes and this was even before the work of one of the more controversial exhibitors had caused quite a bit of discussion on the OCA student forum. This all happened in the days preceding our visit and quite a few different points of view were expressed and countered. I always like to absorb what is being said - giving me time to think and reflect on my own position.

The reason I was so keen to visit the exhibition is that for my critical essay (assignment 4) I have chosen to write about gender representation in photography. The exhibition and discussion will provide a good deal of source material for my research.

Elina Brotherus
The visit was split into two locations, The Photographer's Gallery and The Foundling Museum. At the PG the first piece of work that really caught my attention was a sequence called 'Annunciation' by Elina Brotherus. It dealt with the difficult issue of IVF and the photographer had produced a series of images that portrayed her own journey along this path. There were a number of haunting self portraits showing the artist hunched over in a chair or huddled into a corner, her back to the camera. These images were interspersed with visual analogies to the peaks and troughs of the IVF process - branches of a tree laden with blossom, a bowl of flowers, medical supplies gathered on a sofa, a painted sign of a figure on the road with a small foetus added to it's white stomach. As well as the incredibly poignant story it was the visual language of portrait and metaphor (using mundane everyday objects) that really worked for me.

I had a discussion with another student about the work as he questioned the truth of the images as in some of the portraits a cable release could clearly be seen - indicating the set up nature of the work. In other words how can she be in emotional pain when she is posing for a self portrait and has arranged herself in the room to make the composition? This isn't an issue for me. The photographer is self aware enough to know that in the midst of recording her treatment she is also making art. The very fact of the visible cable release indicates that. There is nothing less truthful about pre-visualising an emotion, and then performing it for the camera. It doesn't make the situation any less real. I would say that as an artist the process is perfectly natural to her. So although the sequence feels very 'real' there is a conceptual element to the work that adds a layer of  complexity. And indeed, the title of the series 'Annunciation' indicates that there is also a religious metaphor. In the catalogue of the exhibition Brotherus writes that:

This is a series of false annunciations. It's about waiting for an angel who never shows up. At first we don't know if he's there, because he could just be hiding behind the doorway. Gradually, it becomes clear that he's not coming. (Brotherus, 2013.)

Leigh Ledare
The exhibition as a whole deals with the construct of 'Motherhood' and gathers together a number of artists that have questioned those cultural ideals. Some of the artist's work has pushed well outside the accepted boundaries that many societies would accept as 'normal' and as such have strained or broken social taboos.

One artist in particular is Leigh Ledare. The artist has photographed his own relationship with his mother. Their story "Pretend You're Actually Alive" told in Ledare's images, video, typed letters, and an old torn out image from a fashion shoot, comes across as having a twisted dynamic that involves a constant struggle between them for dominance and power. Looking at the images, some of them quite shocking, I see a young man that has grown up with a woman that wants to be seen as young, beautiful, successful and powerful. Her own notion of identity puts what she considers to be motherhood way, way, down the list. This in turn has meant that her son has scrambled for ever more attention and the pair have become embroiled in a power play. The mother takes lovers the same age as her adult son and openly exposes him to her activities. By doing this does it make her feel like she is still young? In turn Ledare has photographed their life and held a mirror up - to reflect back at her and expose the dynamics of their relationship.

Alongside the narrative element it is best to not forget that they both have artistic backgrounds. Ledare is a photographer and the mother was once a dancer. So there is definitely an element of performance and staging going on in these images. Some of the sexual scenes are most likely constructed. But undercutting all this is I feel a very real attempt by Ledare to convey an aspect of female identity that attempts to break the stranglehold on the concept of motherhood as only representing a sacred 'earth mother' or 'madonna and child' scenario. Ledare's images portray an aspect of motherhood that he knows from experience to exist - whether we like it or not.

The discussion on the OCA student forum regarding this work was fascinating. Some of the students rejected the work out of hand declaring it as sensationalist or not worthy of analysis. Personally, I found the dismissive attitudes (by some) to be an attempt to shut down the conversation and a real insight into how social taboos operate in society. The comments were almost as interesting as Ledare's work itself!

Janine Antoni
This work was more visually conceptual in nature than some of the others. Antoni had photographed herself suspended from the floor of a room in what appeared to be a kind of straitjacket/corset contraption that had long web-like tendrils that attached to the walls and ceiling. Her feet dangled above the floor of what looked to be a child's room with toys and a play design rug. Around her hips and thighs is constructed a dolls house with its wings open to expose the interior. This image was produced as a digital C type print on a large scale on glass. The rest of the sequence is much smaller and framed. These images show close-ups of the dolls house through which the viewer can see the bare skin of the artist's legs as they extend through the structure. Inside a real spider is constructing its web.

My first thoughts were that the artist is exposing the confining nature of 'motherhood' to be restricted and trapped in a role as it were. Upon reading the exhibition catalogue the artist is exploring a more complex situation in which although there are elements of being trapped she also sees the web as partly a support structure too and the dolls house as a metaphor for providing a place for another being to be grown and nurtured.

Ana Casa Broda
I think the work of the above three artists at the Photographer's Gallery were my favourite. Some of the others were more visually stimulating but the subject matter did not really hold my attention. Ana Casa Broda's 'Kinderwunsch' for example. The images were set out on the wall in a grid pattern and upon entering the gallery space they immediately caught the eye. The panels were without frames and mostly dark colours with a single white one amidst them that created a strong visual impact. The subject mostly seems to be the artist, as mother, sleeping as her child plays nearby. I felt nothing about these images. They seemed to just represent a 'normal' view of day to day motherhood that I couldn't relate to as they are outside of my experience as a child and a childless adult. I discussed this with Jason, one of the other students, and he felt the same about this work and wondered if it was because we were both male. This was an interesting point of view. I hadn't considered that there may be wider connotations - believing that the 'emotional baggage' that I brought with me when I viewed the work was mostly the reason for my indifference. We discussed this further during the coffee break, trying to get at the reason for our apathy. I wondered if I had children myself would I be able to connect more but Jason did and felt the same as me. Then Sharon Boothroyd, one of our tutors for the day joined in. As a woman and mother, Sharon also said that the images didn't particularly engage her - so the 'male' theory was well and truly blown out of the water too.

Interestingly, I was very surprised to read in the exhibition catalogue when writing this post that some of Broda's images represented repressed, unhappy, childhood memories (something I have plenty of experience of!) But, I picked up no evidence of that from the work itself. There was supposed to be some supporting text somewhere which I missed. To me, I think the work gave off a comforting, maternal, vibe. I intend to revisit the exhibition soon so will make a point to take more time with this work.

This post has already become far too long. I think I will break it down into two for the walk to the Foundling Museum exhibition.



references:

Brotherus, E. (2013) Exhibition catalogue, Home Truths: Photography and Motherhood. London, UK: Art Books Publishing Ltd. 


Thursday, 10 October 2013

Exercise: An essay on reviewing photographs


Instruction:

'Read the essay Words and Pictures: On reviewing photographs by Liz Wells in your course reader.'

I used the skills I picked up on how to analyse an essay earlier in the course and put them to use here. Namely, I read the whole essay through once and then on a second read I noted down the salient points from each sub heading and paragraph as concisely as possible.

Origins of Essay

Wells notes the newsletter where the seeds of this essay were originally published. She acknowledges that the newsletter was 'an initiative to stress 'regional networks' and resist the hegemony of the metropolitan.' By doing this Wells is informing the reader that she is using Postmodern Feminist methods of critique whereby the critic/writer is self aware and acknowledges their own subjectivity, political bias, etc.

Words and Pictures

Wells states that it is difficult to describe visual art in words. Therefore the critic must be aware of his/her responsibilities to the audience and the artist. Once an exhibition is over the review will form a large part of the historical archive.

Contexts

The critic operates in a context of changing ideas of critical art theory and academic study. The art market and gallery also have their personal agendas. Sometimes those values compete with one another.

Reviewing Photography Now

Criticism has been undermined by Postmodernist theory. Feminist theory proposes a constructive role for the critic. To break down the old hierarchies by writing reviews that are self aware, come from many different critical positions, and take into account the artists cultural context.

Taste

Traditional power structures have been assailed by new modes of critical thinking - but they still exist. Moving forwards more enlightened thinking will prevail by not perpetuating a hierarchical intellectual order and bringing about a more creative, many positioned, approach to criticism.


I then looked at my notes to get an overall concept of the essay before answering the following questions:

What is the basic argument of Wells's essay?

That criticism should embrace the Postmodern and Feminist approaches to critique of art in order to break down established power hierarchies. Critics moving forward can be more creative and look at art in its cultural context through different critical approaches. This will 'counter status quo agendas.'


Is the essay's title a fair indication of the essay itself?

It is difficult to answer this. The essay is more about the historical development of the art critique and how critical theories from the time of Modernism have been put under scrutiny in the Postmodern age. How the Modernist theories were found to have been elitist and metropolitan and in the new era a more egalitarian approach is required if the status quo is to be resisted.

This to me is more of a political essay rather than a practical one. From an academic standpoint the title is understandable. It gives a nod to the title of the famous 'On Photography' essays by Susan Sontag. I would say that the title was written for its audience (an academic one) and therefore the title is perfectly suited to its content.

To what extent does the writer rely on Postmodernist doctrine?

I would say that the writer fully embraces Postmodern and Feminist doctrine, approves of it and uses it to illustrate her argument. The opening paragraph, "Origins of Essay' illustrates a self aware methodology and is keen to show us her political viewpoint. In saying this I guess the Postmodernist argument goes that ALL critics should do the same so that we are aware of the thinking behind a critics review rather than them making artistic pronouncements as 'fact' when the critic could possibly be clouded by their own prejudices.

Wells gives a breakdown on the critical development of Postmodernism and how this has affected criticism. She goes on to describe Feminism's suggestion of how criticism can be re-made and used to positive affect using many different viewpoints - explaining that this is to provide a more balanced view rather than an elitist one that entrenches power hierarchies and reinforces the status quo.

Wells also includes some text from Bill Jay's 'Occam's Razor' where the author takes to task the notion of female nudity in art as representing oppression and control by men in a paternalistic society. She refutes this argument putting forward her own ideas using contemporary Feminist theory.

The essay raises the issue of the qualifications and duties of a critic. How important do you believe it is for a critic of photography to have deep knowledge of the practice of photography?

I do think it is important where critics are concerned. We all bring our own knowledge, cultural experience and emotional/social baggage to the photographs that we look at. In some respects it doesn't matter that a viewer may be unaware of the artistic/theoretical intent of the artist. If an image speaks to them and brings about some sort of emotional or intellectual response then that is all that matters. But, a critic's review is another matter entirely. A review is expected to be written with the historical and theoretical underpinning of the work - placing it in a context against that which it can be measured. If that context is not understood then how can a critic judge a piece of work or an exhibition a success?

The duties of a critic as explained by Wells are also clear. The critic should openly make their biases known. This, coupled with their critical knowledge, will allow the reader of such reviews to be able to make a clear judgement on the value of the review itself. For instance, I would always take a review on photography (if there were ever likely to be any) by Brian Sewell the art critic with a pinch of salt. He is well known for his distaste of photography as an art form. He belongs to the old guard of considering painting as at the top of the fine arts with a few old blokes at the top of the tree like some sort of god-like geniuses. This view has been considered terribly old fashioned for many decades and is the kind of status quo power hierarchies that Wells is alluding to. I should imagine that Sewell will reject photography as art with his dying breath - The Postmodernist and Feminist approach takes this bias into account and puts it into context. We are then able to make our own judgement on any reviews that come from such sources.